Ron Alston v. State of Florida
This text of Ron Alston v. State of Florida (Ron Alston v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 5D2023-3696 LT Case No. 2012-CF-003671-A _____________________________
RON ALSTON,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County. Donna M. Goerner, Judge.
Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Edward J. Weiss, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marissa V. Giles, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
August 23, 2024
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Ron Alston appeals the trial court’s revocation of his probation and resulting prison sentence. We affirm without comment his probation revocation. However, we reverse the sentence because the trial court imposed the previously suspended twelve-year sentence without affording Alston a sentencing hearing. While the sentence imposed was clearly lawful and within the discretion of the trial court, the imposition of sentence—without allowing Alston an opportunity to present evidence and argument regarding his sentence—was not. See Witt v. State, 983 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008). As the State rightly concedes before this Court, doing so was fundamental error that violated Alston’s constitutional right to due process. See Smith v. State, 268 So. 3d 831, 834 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (“A trial court's refusal to hear evidence and argument regarding a sentence constitutes a denial of due process and is fundamental error.”).
Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of Alston’s probation but reverse the sentence imposed. The case is remanded to the trial court for a sentencing hearing to be conducted before a new trial judge. See id. at 834–35.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
EDWARDS, C.J., and SOUD and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ron Alston v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ron-alston-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.