Romulus Development Corp. v. Township of Weehawken
9 N.J. Tax 90
Opinion
We affirm substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Lasser in his opinion published at 7 N.J.Tax 305 (Tax Ct.1985).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Romulus Development Corp. v. Township of Weehawken, 9 N.J. Tax 90 (N.J. Ct. App. 1987).
9 N.J. Tax 90 (Romulus Development Corp. v. Township of Weehawken) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
CIBA SPECIALTY CHEMICALS, CORP. VS. TOWNSHIP OF DOVER (TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2021
Belmont Associates, C/O Chase Bank v. Township of Franklin / Core Properties v. Township of Franklin
New Jersey Tax Court, 2020
Ciba Speciality Chemicals Corp v. Township of Dover
New Jersey Tax Court, 2017
Orient Way Corp. v. Township of Lyndhurst
27 N.J. Tax 361 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2013)
Austin v. Township of Pemberton
25 N.J. Tax 362 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2010)
Passarella v. Township of Wall
22 N.J. Tax 600 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2004)
Mocco v. City of Jersey City (In Re Mocco)
222 B.R. 440 (D. New Jersey, 1998)
Mori v. Town of Secaucus
15 N.J. Tax 607 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1996)
STATE BY COM'R OF TRANSP. v. Caoili
639 A.2d 275 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1994)
Ford Motor Co. v. Edison Township
10 N.J. Tax 153 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1988)