Romps v. Romps

209 A.D. 832
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1924
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 209 A.D. 832 (Romps v. Romps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Romps v. Romps, 209 A.D. 832 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Interlocutory judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Finding of fact V, and so much of VI as finds that Rocco Tirello, defendant’s husband, is alive, and that the marriage between defendant and said Rocco Tirello is still in force and effect, and conclusions of law I to III, inclusive, reversed on the ground that they are against the weight of the evidence. The burden was upon plaintiff to establish that defendant’s first husband was alive at the time of her marriage to plaintiff, and he cannot rely upon the presumption of life as against the presumption of innocence and validity of the marriage which he seeks to annul. (Palmer v. Palmer, 162 N. Y. 130; Matter of Meehan, 150 App. Div. 681; Smith v. Smith, 112 Misc. Rep. 371.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Kelby and Kapper, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ventura v. Ventura
53 Misc. 2d 881 (New York Supreme Court, 1967)
Claim of Esmond v. Thomas Lyons Bar & Grill
26 A.D.2d 884 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)
Di Claudio v. Di Claudio
205 Misc. 532 (New York Supreme Court, 1954)
Layton v. Layton
189 Misc. 974 (New York Supreme Court, 1947)
Chayka v. Chayka
179 Misc. 979 (New York Supreme Court, 1943)
In re the Estate of Sciscenti
157 Misc. 499 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 A.D. 832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romps-v-romps-nyappdiv-1924.