Romo v. State

95 S.W.2d 126, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 741
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 3, 1936
DocketNo. 18398
StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.W.2d 126 (Romo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Romo v. State, 95 S.W.2d 126, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 741 (Tex. 1936).

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is murder; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for ten years.

The evidence that was heard before the trial judge is not brought up for review. In the absence of the evidence, none of the matters of which complaint is made can be appraised. We are therefore constrained to affirm the judgment of conviction. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.W.2d 126, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romo-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.