Romnick Food, Inc. v. Sunnydale Farms, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Romnick Food, Inc. v. Sunnydale Farms, Inc.

109 A.D.2d 874, 487 N.Y.S.2d 66, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47394

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 109 A.D.2d 874 (Romnick Food, Inc. v. Sunnydale Farms, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Romnick Food, Inc. v. Sunnydale Farms, Inc., 109 A.D.2d 874, 487 N.Y.S.2d 66, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47394 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for breach of contract and price discrimination, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Scholnick, J.), dated July 17, 1984, which denied its motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.

Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[875]*875The complaint of plaintiff, a former grocery store owner, against defendant, a milk distributor, states a sufficient cause of action for breach of the contract provision regarding price. The complaint further states a sufficient claim for unlawful price discrimination pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law § 258-t. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover damages for breach of contract and price discrimination, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Scholnick, J.), dated July 17, 1984, which denied its motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.

Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[875]*875The complaint of plaintiff, a former grocery store owner, against defendant, a milk distributor, states a sufficient cause of action for breach of the contract provision regarding price. The complaint further states a sufficient claim for unlawful price discrimination pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law § 258-t. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 A.D.2d 874, 487 N.Y.S.2d 66, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romnick-food-inc-v-sunnydale-farms-inc-nyappdiv-1985.