Rommy v. United States

641 F. App'x 286
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 22, 2016·No. No. 15-7955·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Henk Orlando Rommy seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his appeal of the magistrate judge’s order certifying his extradition pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3184 (2012). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Rommy seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Zhenli Ye Gon v. Holt, 774 F.3d 207, 210-11 (4th Cir.2014), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2859, 192 L.Ed.2d 895 (2015). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rommy v. United States, 641 F. App'x 286 (4th Cir. 2016).

641 F. App'x 286 (Rommy v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)
Zhenli Gon v. Gerald Holt
774 F.3d 207 (Fourth Circuit, 2014)