Rominger v. Neil
This text of 133 P. 1198 (Rominger v. Neil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The plaintiff in the action against him in the justice’s court interposed the same defense'that he has here, and was defeated. He then brought this suit in the Circuit Court, which, after seeing the witnesses and hearing their testimony, again found against him. After a careful perusal of the testimony and a comparison of plaintiff’s own testimony with the reckless statements made in his complaint, we are disposed to credit defendant’s statements as to the real contract between the parties and as to plaintiff’s failure to give satisfaction. Taking this view of the facts, plaintiff has no case, either in law or in equity, and the decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
133 P. 1198, 66 Or. 107, 1913 Ore. LEXIS 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rominger-v-neil-or-1913.