Romie v. Casanova
This text of 91 U.S. 379 (Romie v. Casanova) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
No Federal question is presented by the record in this case. The action was brought to recover the possession of certain lands. Both parties claimed title from the city of San Jose; and the question to be determined was, which of the .two had actually obtained a grant of the particular premises in controversy. The title of the city was not drawn in question. Even if it depended upon'the treaty of Guadaloupe Hidalgo and the several acts of Congress to ascertain- and settle private land, claims in California, the case would not be different. Both parties admit that title, and their litigation extends only to’ the determination .of the rights which they have severally acquired under it. The writ is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 U.S. 379, 23 L. Ed. 374, 1875 U.S. LEXIS 1379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romie-v-casanova-scotus-1876.