Romie v. Casanova

91 U.S. 379, 23 L. Ed. 374, 1875 U.S. LEXIS 1379
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 31, 1876
Docket127
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 91 U.S. 379 (Romie v. Casanova) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Romie v. Casanova, 91 U.S. 379, 23 L. Ed. 374, 1875 U.S. LEXIS 1379 (1876).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

No Federal question is presented by the record in this case. The action was brought to recover the possession of certain lands. Both parties claimed title from the city of San Jose; and the question to be determined was, which of the .two had actually obtained a grant of the particular premises in controversy. The title of the city was not drawn in question. Even if it depended upon'the treaty of Guadaloupe Hidalgo and the several acts of Congress to ascertain- and settle private land, claims in California, the case would not be different. Both parties admit that title, and their litigation extends only to’ the determination .of the rights which they have severally acquired under it. The writ is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chapman & Dewey Land Co. v. Bigelow
206 U.S. 41 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Howard v. Illinois Cent. R.
148 F. 997 (W.D. Tennessee, 1907)
McCune v. Essig
122 F. 588 (Ninth Circuit, 1903)
Joy v. City of St. Louis
122 F. 524 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri, 1903)
Blackburn v. Portland Gold Mining Co.
175 U.S. 571 (Supreme Court, 1900)
King v. Lawson
84 F. 209 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Dakota, 1897)
Evans v. Durango Land & Coal Co.
80 F. 433 (Eighth Circuit, 1897)
Kenyon v. Knipe
46 F. 309 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington, 1891)
MacE v. Merrill
119 U.S. 581 (Supreme Court, 1887)
California Ex Rel. Hastings v. Jackson
112 U.S. 233 (Supreme Court, 1884)
McFadden v. Robinson
22 F. 10 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1884)
Gay v. Lyons
10 F. Cas. 112 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana, 1877)
McStay v. Friedman
92 U.S. 723 (Supreme Court, 1876)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 U.S. 379, 23 L. Ed. 374, 1875 U.S. LEXIS 1379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romie-v-casanova-scotus-1876.