Romie v. Casanova

California Supreme Court

Romie v. Casanova

45 Cal. 131

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1872

DocketNo. 3,436

StatusPublished

This text of 45 Cal. 131 (Romie v. Casanova) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Romie v. Casanova, 45 Cal. 131 (Cal. 1872).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court:

The Court below finds that the demanded premises were granted by the Alcalde to the defendant’s grantor in 1845, and that juridical possession thereof was given. We think the evidence justifies the finding. The words in the grant, “this lot being situated to the south of the house of the citizen Buelna,” do not necessarily imply that the lot was immediately adjoining the house of Buelna. It may well have been, where the Court finds it was, to the south of the Buelna lot.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court:

The Court below finds that the demanded premises were granted by the Alcalde to the defendant’s grantor in 1845, and that juridical possession thereof was given. We think the evidence justifies the finding. The words in the grant, “this lot being situated to the south of the house of the citizen Buelna,” do not necessarily imply that the lot was immediately adjoining the house of Buelna. It may well have been, where the Court finds it was, to the south of the Buelna lot.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 Cal. 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romie-v-casanova-cal-1872.