Romie Neal v. Seyed M. Hejazi and Seyed P. Hajazi

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 18, 2013·No. 01-12-00885-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION Cause Number: 01-12-00885-CV Trial Court Cause Number: 1030221 Style: Romie Neal v Seyed M. Hejazi and Seyed P. Hajazi Date motion filed*: January 16, 2013 Type of motion: Motion to extend time to file notice of appeal Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? Yes No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: Number of previous extensions granted: Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

Granted If document is to be filed, document due: Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________

Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of

Date: March 18, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Romie Neal v. Seyed M. Hejazi and Seyed P. Hajazi, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Romie Neal v. Seyed M. Hejazi and Seyed P. Hajazi (Romie Neal v. Seyed M. Hejazi and Seyed P. Hajazi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.