Romick v. Fried Trading Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Romick v. Fried Trading Corp.

25 A.D.2d 834, 269 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4236

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 16, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.2d 834 (Romick v. Fried Trading Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Romick v. Fried Trading Corp., 25 A.D.2d 834, 269 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4236 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for a stay granted on condition that the appellants procure the record on appeal and appellants’ points to be served and filed on or before May 18, 1966, said appeal to be argued or submitted on May 24, 1966, and on the further condition that the appellants post an additional bond in the sum of $25,000 on or before May 16, 1966 to secure defendants in the event of loss caused by the injunction pendente lite. Respondents’ points are to be served and filed on or before May 23, 1966. In the meantime, the case in the Supreme Court shall retain its place on the calendar.

Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for a stay granted on condition that the appellants procure the record on appeal and appellants’ points to be served and filed on or before May 18, 1966, said appeal to be argued or submitted on May 24, 1966, and on the further condition that the appellants post an additional bond in the sum of $25,000 on or before May 16, 1966 to secure defendants in the event of loss caused by the injunction pendente lite. Respondents’ points are to be served and filed on or before May 23, 1966. In the meantime, the case in the Supreme Court shall retain its place on the calendar.

Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 834, 269 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romick-v-fried-trading-corp-nyappdiv-1966.