Romeyn v. King

2 How. Pr. 129
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1846
StatusPublished

This text of 2 How. Pr. 129 (Romeyn v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Romeyn v. King, 2 How. Pr. 129 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1846).

Opinion

Beardsley, Justice.

Denied the motion, with costs, and stated that it was against all experience that so many witnesses were necessary in an action of libel, and,- without looking at the papers on the other side, he should deny the motion, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 How. Pr. 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romeyn-v-king-nysupct-1846.