Romero v. Warden

630 F. App'x 202
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 19, 2016·No. No. 15-6961·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rafael Romero seeks to appeal the district court’s decision to return his motion for miscellaneous relief without docketing it because the motion pertained to the filing fee in a case that was closed in 2013. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012). The decision Romero seeks to appeal is not an appealable judgment or order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Romero v. Warden, 630 F. App'x 202 (4th Cir. 2016).

630 F. App'x 202 (Romero v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related