Romero v. Warden

Fourth Circuit

Romero v. Warden

568 F. App'x 259

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 28, 2014·No. No. 13-7568·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Rafael Romero, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Romero v. Warden, No. 1:13— cv-00036-JFM, 2013 WL 4507597 (D.Md. Aug. 22, 2013). We deny Romero’s motion for this court to order a missing document and his motion to amend. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Rafael Romero, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Romero v. Warden, No. 1:13— cv-00036-JFM, 2013 WL 4507597 (D.Md. Aug. 22, 2013). We deny Romero’s motion for this court to order a missing document and his motion to amend. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Romero v. Warden, 568 F. App'x 259 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

568 F. App'x 259 (Romero v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related