Romero v. State
50 So. 3d 753, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19454, 2010 WL 5174354
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Romero v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19772 →
Opinion
Affirmed without prejudice to the appellant filing a sufficient motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) on the new ground for relief raised in the appellant’s motion for rehearing from his first motion, i.e., that the trial court failed to orally adjudicate appellant a habitual offender.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Romero v. State, 50 So. 3d 753, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19454, 2010 WL 5174354 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).
50 So. 3d 753 (Romero v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Justice Administrative Commission v. Taylor
50 So. 3d 753 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)