Romero v. Romero

266 A.D.2d 367, 698 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11556

This text of 266 A.D.2d 367 (Romero v. Romero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Romero v. Romero, 266 A.D.2d 367, 698 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11556 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the [368]*368Supreme Court, Nassau County (Dunne, J.), dated April 5, 1999, which denied his motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted.

Under the facts of this case, the Supreme Court improperly denied the plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability. In support of his motion, the plaintiff presented evidence that the subject collision occurred because the driver of the vehicle in which he was a passenger fell asleep at the wheel. This evidence raised a presumption of negligence on the part of the defendant driver, which the defendants could “overcome by the introduction of competent evidence that excuse [d] or explain[ed] his conduct” (Spivak v Heyward, 248 AD2d 58, 59). Because the defendants offered no evidence to overcome this presumption of negligence, the plaintiff was entitled to partial summary judgment on the issue of liability (see, Spivak v Heyward, supra). S. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spivak v. Heyward
248 A.D.2d 58 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 A.D.2d 367, 698 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romero-v-romero-nyappdiv-1999.