Romero v. Romero
708 So. 2d 1027, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3658, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 904
This text of 708 So. 2d 1027 (Romero v. Romero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Romero v. Romero, 708 So. 2d 1027, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3658, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 904 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
Opinion
Because the appellant has failed to demonstrate an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court, Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980), and because the trial court followed the recommended practice of providing us with an order that substantiated every ruling, the final judgment of dissolution of marriage is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
708 So. 2d 1027, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3658, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romero-v-romero-fladistctapp-1998.