Romero v. McDonald
This text of Romero v. McDonald (Romero v. McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
PAUL R. ROMERO, Claimant-Appellant
v.
ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee ______________________
2014-7131 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 13-1001, Chief Judge Bruce E. Kasold. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
KENNETH M. CARPENTER, Law offices of Carpenter Chartered, Topeka, KS, argued for claimant-appellant.
SHARI A. ROSE, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washing- ton, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., MARTIN F. HOCKEY, JR.; Y. KEN LEE, MARTIE S. ADELMAN, Office of General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
September 15, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Romero v. McDonald, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romero-v-mcdonald-cafc-2015.