Home/Supreme Court/Romero v. Hodgson

Romero v. Hodgson

403 U.S. 901, 91 S. Ct. 2215
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 7, 1971·No. No. 6847·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Appeal from D. C. N. D. Cal. Motion of appellants for leave to proceed in forma' pauperis granted. Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Romero v. Hodgson, 403 U.S. 901, 91 S. Ct. 2215 (1971).

403 U.S. 901 (Romero v. Hodgson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Higgs v. Western Landscaping & Sprinkler Systems, Inc.
789 P.2d 431 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1989)
Jenkins v. Hayes
560 F. Supp. 918 (S.D. Indiana, 1983)
Sheppard v. State
650 P.2d 643 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1982)
Ertman v. Fusari
442 F. Supp. 1147 (D. Connecticut, 1977)
Eula Mae Fisher, for Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. The Secretary of the United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
522 F.2d 493 (Seventh Circuit, 1975)
Jane Doe v. James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor
500 F.2d 1206 (Second Circuit, 1974)
L.A.J., Inc. v. State Board of Equalization
38 Cal. App. 3d 549 (California Court of Appeal, 1974)
Steinberg v. Fusari
364 F. Supp. 922 (D. Connecticut, 1973)