Romero v. Hodgson

403 U.S. 901, 91 S. Ct. 2215
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 7, 1971
DocketNo. 6847
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 403 U.S. 901 (Romero v. Hodgson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Romero v. Hodgson, 403 U.S. 901, 91 S. Ct. 2215 (1971).

Opinion

Appeal from D. C. N. D. Cal. Motion of appellants for leave to proceed in forma' pauperis granted. Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Higgs v. Western Landscaping & Sprinkler Systems, Inc.
789 P.2d 431 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1989)
Jenkins v. Hayes
560 F. Supp. 918 (S.D. Indiana, 1983)
Sheppard v. State
650 P.2d 643 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1982)
Ertman v. Fusari
442 F. Supp. 1147 (D. Connecticut, 1977)
Jane Doe v. James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor
500 F.2d 1206 (Second Circuit, 1974)
L.A.J., Inc. v. State Board of Equalization
38 Cal. App. 3d 549 (California Court of Appeal, 1974)
Steinberg v. Fusari
364 F. Supp. 922 (D. Connecticut, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
403 U.S. 901, 91 S. Ct. 2215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romero-v-hodgson-scotus-1971.