Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Romero v. Harbin

Romero v. Harbin

876 So. 2d 1, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 4583, 2004 WL 735858
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 7, 2004
DocketNo. 3D03-2820
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 876 So. 2d 1 (Romero v. Harbin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Romero v. Harbin, 876 So. 2d 1, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 4583, 2004 WL 735858 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Michael Romero appeals an order dismissing his personal injury action. The trial court granted the appellees’ motion to dismiss for fraud, finding that there had been material misrepresentations and omissions regarding his previous medical history, educational attainment, and previous work history. We affirm on authority of Long v. Swofford, 805 So.2d 882 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

Affirmed.

COPE and SHEVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Papadopoulos v. Cruise Ventures Three Corp.
974 So. 2d 418 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
876 So. 2d 1, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 4583, 2004 WL 735858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romero-v-harbin-fladistctapp-2004.