Romero v. Core Civic, Inc.

D. New Mexico

Romero v. Core Civic, Inc.

DecidedFebruary 1, 2023

Docket1:21-cv-00544

StatusUnknown

This text of Romero v. Core Civic, Inc. (Romero v. Core Civic, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Mexico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Romero v. Core Civic, Inc., (D.N.M. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO RUBEN ROMERO, , Plaintiff, v. CIV No. 21-0544 KG/KRS

CORE CIVIC, INC., et al., Defendants. ORDER OF REFERENCE In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. $$ 636(b)(1)(B), (b)(3), and Va. Beach Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Wood, 901 F.2d 849 (10 Cir. 1990), this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea to conduct hearings, if warranted, including evidentiary hearings, and to perform any legal analysis required to recommend to the Court an ultimate disposition of Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions for Discovery Misconduct (Doc. 144). The Magistrate Judge will submit an analysis, including findings of fact, if necessary, and recommended disposition, to the District Judge assigned to the case, with copies provided to the parties. The parties will be given the opportunity to object to the proposed findings, analysis, and disposition as described in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the proposed disposition. naan UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO RUBEN ROMERO, , Plaintiff, v. CIV No. 21-0544 KG/KRS

CORE CIVIC, INC., et al., Defendants. ORDER OF REFERENCE In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. $$ 636(b)(1)(B), (b)(3), and Va. Beach Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Wood, 901 F.2d 849 (10 Cir. 1990), this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea to conduct hearings, if warranted, including evidentiary hearings, and to perform any legal analysis required to recommend to the Court an ultimate disposition of Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions for Discovery Misconduct (Doc. 144). The Magistrate Judge will submit an analysis, including findings of fact, if necessary, and recommended disposition, to the District Judge assigned to the case, with copies provided to the parties. The parties will be given the opportunity to object to the proposed findings, analysis, and disposition as described in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the proposed disposition. naan UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Romero v. Core Civic, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romero-v-core-civic-inc-nmd-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack