Romero-Ramirez v. Holder
This text of 320 F. App'x 806 (Romero-Ramirez v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jesus Romero-Ramirez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board , of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision pretermit-ting his application for adjustment of status. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo constitutional questions and questions of law, Becker v. Gonzales, 473 F.3d 1000, 1001 n. 2 (9th [807]*807Cir.2007), and we deny the petition for review.
Romero-Ramirez’s contention that the agency’s retroactive application of the expanded aggravated felony definition in the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43), violates due process by denying him relief is foreclosed. See Becker, 473 F.3d at 1002-03.
We agree with the agency that Romero-Ramirez’s 1985 aggravated felony convictions render him statutorily ineligible for a § 212(h) waiver. See Becker, 473 F.3d at 1003-04 (grant of § 212(c) relief only waives the finding of deportability; the crimes alleged to be grounds of deportability do not disappear from the alien’s record for immigration purposes); see also 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h)(2).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
320 F. App'x 806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romero-ramirez-v-holder-ca9-2009.