Romero, Ex Parte Gregorio
This text of Romero, Ex Parte Gregorio (Romero, Ex Parte Gregorio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant pleaded guilty to aggravated sexual assault. The trial court deferred an adjudication of guilt and placed Appellant on supervision for ten years.
Appellant filed a writ application pursuant to Art. 11.072 alleging that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010). The trial court denied relief. On appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed, holding that counsel was ineffective under Padilla. Ex parte Romero, 351 S.W.3d 127 (Tex. App. - San Antonio 2011).
The State has filed a petition for discretionary review of this decision. The U.S. Supreme Court recently held that, under Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989), Padilla does not have retroactive effect. Chaidez v. United States, __ U.S. __, 133 S. Ct. 1103 (2013). Today, we adopted that Court's reasoning as a matter of state law in Ex parte De Los Reyes, No. PD-1457-11, __ S.W.3d __ (Tex. Crim. App. March 20, 2013).
The Court of Appeals in the instant case did not have the benefit of our opinion in De Los Reyes. Accordingly, we grant the State's petition for discretionary review, vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remand this case to the Court of Appeals in light of De Los Reyes.
DATE DELIVERED: March 20, 2013
PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Romero, Ex Parte Gregorio, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romero-ex-parte-gregorio-texcrimapp-2013.