Romero, Carlos
This text of Romero, Carlos (Romero, Carlos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-90,050-01
EX PARTE CARLOS ROMERO, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 17-02004-CRF-272-A IN THE 272ND DISTRICT COURT FROM BRAZOS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of the manufacture
or delivery of a controlled substance and sentenced to four and one-half years’ imprisonment.
Applicant contends that he is not being properly credited by the Texas Department of
Criminal Justice (TDCJ) with pre-sentence jail time credit awarded on his judgment. Applicant has
alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these circumstances, additional facts are
needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial
court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. 2
The trial court shall order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s Office of the General
Counsel to file an affidavit listing Applicant’s sentence begin date, the pre-sentence jail time that has
been awarded to him in this cause, and his maximum discharge date. Finally, the affidavit should
indicate whether or not Applicant has submitted his claim to the time credit resolution system of
TDCJ, and if so, the date when the claim was submitted.
The trial court may also order depositions, interrogatories or a hearing. If the trial court elects
to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and
wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant
at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant
has properly exhausted his administrative remedies as required by TEX . GOV ’T CODE § 501.0081(b)-
(c). The trial court shall then make findings and conclusions as to whether Applicant is receiving
credit for his pre-sentence jail time as listed on his judgment. The trial court shall also make any
other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition
of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must
be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. 3
Filed: July 24, 2019 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Romero, Carlos, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romero-carlos-texcrimapp-2019.