Romerhaus v. Romerhaus

93 So. 3d 455, 2012 WL 2919119, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11663
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 18, 2012·No. No. 2D11-5123·Published

Opinion

MORRIS, Judge.

Erik Romerhaus appeals the circuit court’s denial of his motion to affirm expiration of a domestic violence injunction. We affirm but write to point out that the [456]*456injunction expired on its own terms on February 14, 2007. To the extent that Romerhaus claims that the notification requirements of section 741.30(8)(c)(5), Florida Statutes (2006), were not followed, our affirmance is without prejudice to any right he may have to seek mandamus relief in the circuit court. See City of Tarpon Springs v. Planes, 30 So.3d 693, 695 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (holding that mandamus may be employed to require a governmental entity to perform a ministerial duty that is expressly imposed by law).

Affirmed.

WHATLEY and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Romerhaus v. Romerhaus, 93 So. 3d 455, 2012 WL 2919119, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11663 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

93 So. 3d 455 (Romerhaus v. Romerhaus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Tarpon Springs v. PLANES
30 So. 3d 693 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)