Romerhaus v. Romerhaus

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Romerhaus v. Romerhaus

93 So. 3d 455, 2012 WL 2919119, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11663

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 18, 2012

DocketNo. 2D11-5123

StatusPublished

This text of 93 So. 3d 455 (Romerhaus v. Romerhaus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Romerhaus v. Romerhaus, 93 So. 3d 455, 2012 WL 2919119, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11663 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

MORRIS, Judge.

Erik Romerhaus appeals the circuit court’s denial of his motion to affirm expiration of a domestic violence injunction. We affirm but write to point out that the [456]*456injunction expired on its own terms on February 14, 2007. To the extent that Romerhaus claims that the notification requirements of section 741.30(8)(c)(5), Florida Statutes (2006), were not followed, our affirmance is without prejudice to any right he may have to seek mandamus relief in the circuit court. See City of Tarpon Springs v. Planes, 30 So.3d 693, 695 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (holding that mandamus may be employed to require a governmental entity to perform a ministerial duty that is expressly imposed by law).

Affirmed.

WHATLEY and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORRIS, Judge.

Erik Romerhaus appeals the circuit court’s denial of his motion to affirm expiration of a domestic violence injunction. We affirm but write to point out that the [456]*456injunction expired on its own terms on February 14, 2007. To the extent that Romerhaus claims that the notification requirements of section 741.30(8)(c)(5), Florida Statutes (2006), were not followed, our affirmance is without prejudice to any right he may have to seek mandamus relief in the circuit court. See City of Tarpon Springs v. Planes, 30 So.3d 693, 695 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (holding that mandamus may be employed to require a governmental entity to perform a ministerial duty that is expressly imposed by law).

Affirmed.

WHATLEY and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 So. 3d 455, 2012 WL 2919119, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romerhaus-v-romerhaus-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack