Romer v. Romer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Romer v. Romer

537 So. 2d 679, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 264, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 281

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 24, 1989

DocketNos. 88-836, 88-1267

StatusPublished

This text of 537 So. 2d 679 (Romer v. Romer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Romer v. Romer, 537 So. 2d 679, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 264, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 281 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find that there was sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s Order Establishing Respondent/Father as Primary Residential Parent of the Minor Child, Braden H. Romer, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in changing custody from the mother to the father upon a showing of changed circumstances. Spradley v. Spradley, 335 So.2d 822 (Fla.1976); Kuntz v. Kuntz, 464 So.2d 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Goldstein v. Goldstein, 264 So.2d 49 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972).

In addition, we affirm the trial court’s removal of the prohibition against taking the minor child on hunting, target, or other shooting trips. Appellant has failed to present a transcript in support of her contention that the trial court abused its discretion. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find that there was sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s Order Establishing Respondent/Father as Primary Residential Parent of the Minor Child, Braden H. Romer, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in changing custody from the mother to the father upon a showing of changed circumstances. Spradley v. Spradley, 335 So.2d 822 (Fla.1976); Kuntz v. Kuntz, 464 So.2d 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Goldstein v. Goldstein, 264 So.2d 49 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972).

In addition, we affirm the trial court’s removal of the prohibition against taking the minor child on hunting, target, or other shooting trips. Appellant has failed to present a transcript in support of her contention that the trial court abused its discretion. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979).

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

537 So. 2d 679, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 264, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romer-v-romer-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack