Romeo v. Romeo

39 A.D.2d 559, 331 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5007
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 10, 1972·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

In a matrimonial action, plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 14, 1971, which denied his motion to vacate a decree of separation, to reinstate his action for annulment, and to modify support provisions. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The judgment of separation is res judicata as to the validity of the marriage [560]*560(Statter v. Statter, 2 N Y 2d 668; Psaroudis v. Psaroudis, 27 N Y 2d 527). As plaintiff’s allegations do not fall into the category of newly discovered evidence, it would have been improper to reopen issues inherently decided in the action two years before (Matter of Wareham v. Wareham, 34 A D 2d 647). Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Martuseello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Romeo v. Romeo, 39 A.D.2d 559, 331 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5007 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

39 A.D.2d 559 (Romeo v. Romeo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rigwan v. Neus
205 A.D.3d 1062 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Smith v. Tomlinson
136 A.D.2d 646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Romeo v. Romeo
72 A.D.2d 808 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Romeo v. Romeo
237 S.E.2d 143 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1977)