Romeo v. Malta
This text of 55 A.D.3d 330 (Romeo v. Malta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered July 10, 2007, dismissing the third-party action seeking a judgment declaring that third-party defendant Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut is obligated to defend and indemnify its insured, defendant/third-party plaintiff Chelsea Tomato, Inc., in the underlying personal injury action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The record establishes that employees of Chelsea Tomato knew about the accident on the day it happened, as plaintiff in the underlying action fell while descending a staircase in the restaurant and was removed from the scene via ambulance. However, Chelsea Tomato did not notify Travelers until some nine months later. This is as a matter of law an unreasonable delay, which is not excused by Chelsea Tomato’s professed belief that the accident was plaintiffs fault and would result in no liability to itself (see Tower Ins. Co. of N.Y. v Lin Hsin Long Co., 50 AD3d 305, 307-308 [2008]). Concur—Lippman, P.J., Gonzalez, Sweeny, Catterson and DeGrasse, JJ. [See 2007 NY Slip Op 31984(H).]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 A.D.3d 330, 865 N.Y.S.2d 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romeo-v-malta-nyappdiv-2008.