Romeo Amaonwu v. Mahinda A. Ruwanpathirana

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 26, 2019·No. 02-19-00020-CV·Published

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-19-00020-CV ___________________________

ROMEO AMAONWU, Appellant

V.

MAHINDA A. RUWANPATHIRANA, Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. CV-2018-03814

Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION

On August 2, 2019, we notified Romeo Amaonwu that the appellant’s brief

filed on August 1, 2019, is deficient, specifically listing the ways in which the brief

does not comply with the rules of appellate procedure; in particular, it is entirely

devoid of record citations and citation to authority. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(e), (i)(3),

38.1(a)–(b), (g), (i)–(k). We directed appellant to file an amended brief complying with

the appellate rules no later than Monday, August 12, 2019, and warned appellant that

the failure to do so could result in our striking the noncompliant brief and dismissing

the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 9, 38.8(a)(1), 38.9(a), 42.3; 2nd Tex. App. (Fort Worth)

Loc. R. 1. Appellant has not responded to our letter and has not filed a compliant

brief.

Because appellant has failed to file a compliant amended brief despite being

given the opportunity to do so, we strike appellant’s brief and dismiss this appeal for

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 38.9(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: August 26, 2019

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Romeo Amaonwu v. Mahinda A. Ruwanpathirana, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Romeo Amaonwu v. Mahinda A. Ruwanpathirana (Romeo Amaonwu v. Mahinda A. Ruwanpathirana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.