Romeo Amaonwu v. Mahinda A. Ruwanpathirana
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-19-00020-CV ___________________________
ROMEO AMAONWU, Appellant
V.
MAHINDA A. RUWANPATHIRANA, Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. CV-2018-03814
Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION
On August 2, 2019, we notified Romeo Amaonwu that the appellant’s brief
filed on August 1, 2019, is deficient, specifically listing the ways in which the brief
does not comply with the rules of appellate procedure; in particular, it is entirely
devoid of record citations and citation to authority. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(e), (i)(3),
38.1(a)–(b), (g), (i)–(k). We directed appellant to file an amended brief complying with
the appellate rules no later than Monday, August 12, 2019, and warned appellant that
the failure to do so could result in our striking the noncompliant brief and dismissing
the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 9, 38.8(a)(1), 38.9(a), 42.3; 2nd Tex. App. (Fort Worth)
Loc. R. 1. Appellant has not responded to our letter and has not filed a compliant
brief.
Because appellant has failed to file a compliant amended brief despite being
given the opportunity to do so, we strike appellant’s brief and dismiss this appeal for
want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 38.9(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam
Delivered: August 26, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Romeo Amaonwu v. Mahinda A. Ruwanpathirana (Romeo Amaonwu v. Mahinda A. Ruwanpathirana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.