Rome v. American Staffing, LLC

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rome v. American Staffing, LLC

388 S.W.3d 177, 2012 WL 943326, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 369

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 20, 2012·No. No. ED 96980·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rex Rome appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his unemployment benefits on the ground that he was discharged for misconduct connected with his work. We find that the Commission’s decision was supported by competent and substantial evidence that Rome was discharged for misconduct connected to his work. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rex Rome appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his unemployment benefits on the ground that he was discharged for misconduct connected with his work. We find that the Commission’s decision was supported by competent and substantial evidence that Rome was discharged for misconduct connected to his work. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Rome v. American Staffing, LLC, 388 S.W.3d 177, 2012 WL 943326, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 369 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

388 S.W.3d 177 (Rome v. American Staffing, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.