Rome Urban Renewal Agency v. Palma
51 A.D.2d 645, 377 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10991
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated at Special Term, Hancock, J. (Appeal from order of Oneida Supreme Court in condemnation proceeding.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Cardamone and Witmer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rome Urban Renewal Agency v. Palma, 51 A.D.2d 645, 377 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10991 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).
51 A.D.2d 645 (Rome Urban Renewal Agency v. Palma) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.