Rome Urban Renewal Agency v. Palma
51 A.D.2d 645, 377 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10991
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 9, 1976
StatusPublished
This text of 51 A.D.2d 645 (Rome Urban Renewal Agency v. Palma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rome Urban Renewal Agency v. Palma, 51 A.D.2d 645, 377 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10991 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated at Special Term, Hancock, J. (Appeal from order of Oneida Supreme Court in condemnation proceeding.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Cardamone and Witmer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
51 A.D.2d 645, 377 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10991, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rome-urban-renewal-agency-v-palma-nyappdiv-1976.