Rome Brick Co. v. West

67 S.E. 400, 134 Ga. 65, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 110
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 18, 1910·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. In so far as it was sought to foreclose a lien this case is controlled by the ruling in Pike Brothers Lumber Co. v. Mitchell, 132 Ga. 675 (64 S. E. 998), where it was held: “In order to foreclose a materialman’s lien for material furnished a contractor to be used' in improving the property of another, it is necessary that the materialman have judgment against the contractor in a previous action, or the contractor must be sued concurrently in the foreclosure proceedings with the owner of the property improved. If the contractor be adjudged a bankrupt, so that no judgment in personam can be had against him in an action at law, his immunity from liability to a personal judgment will not give the materialman a right to foreclose his lien in equity against the property improved.”

2. The prayer to recover a general judgment against the estate of the deceased landowner was stricken from the petition by amendment.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rome Brick Co. v. West, 67 S.E. 400, 134 Ga. 65, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 110 (Ga. 1910).

67 S.E. 400 (Rome Brick Co. v. West) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Victory Lumber Co. v. Ellison
97 S.E.2d 334 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Willcox Boiler Co. v. Messier
1 N.W.2d 130 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1941)
Chambers Lumber Co. v. Gilmer
5 S.E.2d 84 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Woodward Lumber Co. v. Van Ormer & Son
84 S.E. 370 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1915)
Carr & Co. v. Witt
73 S.E. 668 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)
In re Goodrich
192 F. 746 (N.D. Georgia, 1911)