Romans v. CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF HIGHLAND

721 N.W.2d 594, 477 Mich. 876, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 2100
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 29, 2006
Docket130914
StatusPublished

This text of 721 N.W.2d 594 (Romans v. CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF HIGHLAND) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Romans v. CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF HIGHLAND, 721 N.W.2d 594, 477 Mich. 876, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 2100 (Mich. 2006).

Opinion

721 N.W.2d 594 (2006)

Roger ROMANS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF HIGHLAND, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 130914. COA No. 256251.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 29, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 19, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REINSTATE the order of the Oakland Circuit Court granting summary disposition to the defendant. As this Court explained in Horace v. City of Pontiac, 456 Mich. 744, 757, 575 N.W.2d 762 (1998), "[a] danger of injury caused by the area in front of an entrance or exit is not a danger that is presented by a physical condition of the building itself." In Fane v. Detroit Library Comm, 465 Mich. 68, 78, 631 N.W.2d 678 (2001), this Court held that "in determining whether an item or area outside the four walls of a building is `of a public building,' the courts should consider whether the item or area where the injury occurred is physically connected to and not intended to be removed from the building." Here, the alleged defect is the lack of a physical connection between the sidewalk and the covered entryway; thus, the area complained of is not physically connected to the building. Accordingly, the trial court correctly concluded that the gap between the sidewalk and the entryway is not a defect "of the public building."

MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would deny leave to appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fane v. Detroit Library Commission
631 N.W.2d 678 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2001)
Horace v. City of Pontiac
575 N.W.2d 762 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
721 N.W.2d 594, 477 Mich. 876, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 2100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romans-v-charter-township-of-highland-mich-2006.