Romano v. State
This text of Romano v. State (Romano v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN 'I`HE SUPREl\/LE COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
MARK ROMANO, § § Defendant Bel0W- § No. 25 5, 2014 Appellant, § § v. § Court Below-Superior Court § of the State of Delaware, STA'I`E OF DELAWARE, § in and for Sussex County § Cr. IDNOs. 1206021536, PlaintiffBelow- § 0908014805, and 091201630l Appellee. §
Submitted: August 11, 2014 Decided: August 22, 2014
.QBLB
This ZZ“d day of August 2014, it appears to the Court that, on July 28, 2014, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice to the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to diligently prosecute the appeal by not filing his opening brief and appendix in this matter. The appellant has not responded to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period and therefore dismissal of the appeal is deemed to be unopposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
Justic|e 5 ;
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Romano v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romano-v-state-del-2014.