Romano v. Perales
67 N.Y.2d 848
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (110 AD2d 1028).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Romano v. Perales, 67 N.Y.2d 848 (N.Y. 1986).
67 N.Y.2d 848 (Romano v. Perales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
O'Rourke v. Perales
193 A.D.2d 802 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Forsyth County Board of Social Services v. Division of Social Services
346 S.E.2d 414 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1986)
Weinberg v. Perales
121 A.D.2d 729 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)