Romano v. Oklahoma

Supreme Court

Romano v. Oklahoma

510 U.S. 943, 114 S. Ct. 380

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 1, 1993

Docket92-9093

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 510 U.S. 943 (Romano v. Oklahoma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Romano v. Oklahoma, 510 U.S. 943, 114 S. Ct. 380 (1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “Does admission of evidence that a capital defendant already has been sentenced to death in another case impermissibly undermine the sentencing jury’s sense of responsibility for determining the appropriateness of the defendant’s death, in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “Does admission of evidence that a capital defendant already has been sentenced to death in another case impermissibly undermine the sentencing jury’s sense of responsibility for determining the appropriateness of the defendant’s death, in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

510 U.S. 943, 114 S. Ct. 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romano-v-oklahoma-scotus-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack