Romano v. Maglio
126 A.2d 910, 22 N.J. 574
This text of 126 A.2d 910 (Romano v. Maglio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Romano v. Maglio, 126 A.2d 910, 22 N.J. 574 (N.J. 1956).
Opinion
LEONORA ROMANO, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS,
v.
LOUISE MAGLIO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Messrs. Durand, Ivins & Carton for the petitioners.
Messrs. Whiting, Moore & Phillips for the respondents.
See same case below: 41 N.J. Super. 561.
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Shaw v. Shaw
351 A.2d 374 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
126 A.2d 910, 22 N.J. 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romano-v-maglio-nj-1956.