Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Romano v. Delia

Romano v. Delia

516 So. 2d 279, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2544, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10740, 1987 WL 1168
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 4, 1987
DocketNos. 4-86-1793, 4-86-1794 and 4-86-1795
StatusPublished

This text of 516 So. 2d 279 (Romano v. Delia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Romano v. Delia, 516 So. 2d 279, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2544, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10740, 1987 WL 1168 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. We find no error by the trial court in submitting the case to the jury and no abuse of discretion in ruling on the qualifications of the appellant’s expert witness. See Husky Industries, Inc. v. Black, 434 So.2d 988 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

DOWNEY and DELL, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, J., dissents in part with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Husky Industries, Inc. v. Black
434 So. 2d 988 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
516 So. 2d 279, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2544, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10740, 1987 WL 1168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romano-v-delia-fladistctapp-1987.