Romania v. Lamport & Holt, Ltd.

207 A.D. 861
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1923·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The issue as to whether or not a general release was executed by. plaintiff in this action for personal injuries involves an examination of the extent of such injury. The plaintiff’s claim is that he was so affected physically and mentally by the injury that he was not a voluntary party to the alleged general release. Under such circumstances two-trials involving substantially the same facts would result. For the foregoing reasons we think we should not interfere with the discretion of the Special Term refusing a separate trial of the issue as to the general release. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Kelby and Kapper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Romania v. Lamport & Holt, Ltd., 207 A.D. 861 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).

207 A.D. 861 (Romania v. Lamport & Holt, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fulmer v. Sovocool
26 A.D.2d 889 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)
Mosher v. Mitchell
22 A.D.2d 805 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
Johnson v. Methodist Hospital
27 Misc. 2d 1050 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
In re the Estate of Albright
283 A.D. 1082 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)
Rabin v. Brooklyn Trust Co.
191 Misc. 321 (New York Supreme Court, 1947)
House v. Scheffler
261 A.D. 1088 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)
Spencer v. Hunt
247 A.D. 503 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)