Romania v. Lamport & Holt, Ltd.
This text of 207 A.D. 861 (Romania v. Lamport & Holt, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The issue as to whether or not a general release was executed by. plaintiff in this action for personal injuries involves an examination of the extent of such injury. The plaintiff’s claim is that he was so affected physically and mentally by the injury that he was not a voluntary party to the alleged general release. Under such circumstances two-trials involving substantially the same facts would result. For the foregoing reasons we think we should not interfere with the discretion of the Special Term refusing a separate trial of the issue as to the general release. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Kelby and Kapper, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
207 A.D. 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romania-v-lamport-holt-ltd-nyappdiv-1923.