Romanello v. Hirschfeld

New York Court of Appeals

Romanello v. Hirschfeld

468 N.E.2d 701, 63 N.Y.2d 613, 479 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4498

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 3, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 468 N.E.2d 701 (Romanello v. Hirschfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Romanello v. Hirschfeld, 468 N.E.2d 701, 63 N.Y.2d 613, 479 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4498 (N.Y. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order modified with costs to plaintiffs, plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment granted on the first, second and [615]*615third causes of action as to liability for wrongful eviction and case remitted to Supreme Court, New York County, for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum by Justice E. Leo Milonas at the Appellate Division (98 AD2d 657, 658), and for further proceedings in accordance with that dissenting memorandum; and, as so modified, order affirmed. Question certified answered in the negative.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order modified with costs to plaintiffs, plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment granted on the first, second and [615]*615third causes of action as to liability for wrongful eviction and case remitted to Supreme Court, New York County, for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum by Justice E. Leo Milonas at the Appellate Division (98 AD2d 657, 658), and for further proceedings in accordance with that dissenting memorandum; and, as so modified, order affirmed. Question certified answered in the negative.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

468 N.E.2d 701, 63 N.Y.2d 613, 479 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romanello-v-hirschfeld-ny-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack