Romanello v. Hirschfeld

468 N.E.2d 701, 63 N.Y.2d 613, 479 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4498
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 3, 1984·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order modified with costs to plaintiffs, plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment granted on the first, second and [615]*615third causes of action as to liability for wrongful eviction and case remitted to Supreme Court, New York County, for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum by Justice E. Leo Milonas at the Appellate Division (98 AD2d 657, 658), and for further proceedings in accordance with that dissenting memorandum; and, as so modified, order affirmed. Question certified answered in the negative.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Romanello v. Hirschfeld, 468 N.E.2d 701, 63 N.Y.2d 613, 479 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4498 (N.Y. 1984).

468 N.E.2d 701 (Romanello v. Hirschfeld) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Batiz v. CSA Preserv. Partners LLC
2025 NY Slip Op 25170 (NYC Civil Court, Bronx, 2025)