Romancia v. Roberson
This text of Romancia v. Roberson (Romancia v. Roberson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 14-AUG-2025 08:08 AM Dkt. 65 ORD
NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I
ROSEL ROMANCIA, fka ROSEL LYN ROBERSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JERROLD LEE ROBERSON, Defendant-Appellee, DARRELL W. ROBERSON, Nonparty-Appellant, and SABRINA ROBERSON-ARGEND, Nonparty-Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT (CASE NO. 3DV940000189)
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL AS MOOT (By: Nakasone, Chief Judge, Leonard and Guidry, JJ.)
Upon review of the record, it appears that:
(1) Self-represented Nonparty-Appellant Darrell W.
Roberson (Roberson) filed this appeal on July 28, 2022;
(2) The appeal was docketed on September 26, 2022;
(3) On November 14, 2023, while this appeal was
pending, a "Stipulation to Dismiss All Claims Against Plaintiff-
Appellee [Rosel Romancia (Romancia)] and [Nonparty-Appellee
Sabrina Roberson-Argend (Argend)] in [Roberson's] Appeal on NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Hearing That Was Held on July 20, 2021" (Stipulation), was filed
with the Family Court of the Third Circuit, in Case No.
3DV940000189,1 in which Roberson, Romancia, and Argend agreed
that all claims between them have been settled;
(4) The Stipulation also provided that the parties
agree to dismiss the appeal in CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX, but the parties
did not file a stipulation to dismiss the appeal with this
court, nor did Roberson file a motion to dismiss the appeal with
this court, pursuant to Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule
42(b);
(5) Because the Stipulation provides that all claims
between Roberson, Romancia, and Argend have been settled, it
appears that the court can no longer grant effective relief, and
the appeal is moot. See Cmty. Ass'ns of Hualalai, Inc. v.
Leeward Plan. Comm'n, 150 Hawaiʻi 241, 253, 500 P.3d 426, 438
(2021);
(6) On July 22, 2025, the court issued an Order to
Show Cause (Order) instructing Roberson to file a motion or
stipulation seeking dismissal of the appeal, or a statement
demonstrating why the appeal should not be dismissed as moot,
within fourteen days of the Order, and that failure to timely
respond may result in the dismissal of the appeal;
1 The Honorable Jeffrey W. Ng presided.
2 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
(7) Roberson did not respond to the Order.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is
dismissed as moot.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, August 14, 2025.
/s/ Karen T. Nakasone Chief Judge
/s/ Katherine G. Leonard Associate Judge
/s/ Kimberly T. Guidry Associate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Romancia v. Roberson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romancia-v-roberson-hawapp-2025.