Romana Lucia Ruiz v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 6, 2002
Docket07-01-00482-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Romana Lucia Ruiz v. State (Romana Lucia Ruiz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Romana Lucia Ruiz v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

NO. 07-01-0482-CR


IN THE COURT OF APPEALS



FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



AT AMARILLO



PANEL A



MARCH 6, 2002



______________________________



ROMANA LUCIA RUIZ, APPELLANT



V.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE



_________________________________



FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF POTTER COUNTY;



NO. 95444; HONORABLE W.F. CORKY ROBERTS, JUDGE



_______________________________



Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

Appellant Romana Lucia Ruiz gave notice of appeal on December 5, 2001. However, she has now filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, which both she and her attorney have signed.

Because the motion to dismiss meets the requirements of Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and this court has not delivered its decision prior to receiving appellant's motion to dismiss, the motion is hereby granted.

Having dismissed this appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.



John T. Boyd

Chief Justice



Do not publish.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

          Before the Court are appellant’s motions to dismiss these appeals pursuant to Rule 42.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Rule 42.2 states that at any time before the appellate court’s decision, the court may dismiss an appeal upon the appellant’s motion. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). The appellant and his attorney must sign the written motion to dismiss. Id.

          All of the requirements of Rule 42.2(a) have been satisfied. The Court has considered these causes on appellant’s motions and concludes the motions should be granted and the appeals should be dismissed.

          Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed. No motions for rehearing will be entertained and our mandates will issue forthwith.

                                                                           Mackey K. Hancock

                                                                                     Justice





Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Romana Lucia Ruiz v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romana-lucia-ruiz-v-state-texapp-2002.