Roman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Roman v. State

93 So. 3d 1193, 2012 WL 3192737, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13199

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 8, 2012

DocketNo. 4D11-1034

StatusPublished

This text of 93 So. 3d 1193 (Roman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roman v. State, 93 So. 3d 1193, 2012 WL 3192737, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13199 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the order denying Roman’s motion for post-conviction relief, the trial court fully adopted the state’s written response to Roman’s motion. However, in the state’s written response, the state conceded that Roman was entitled to ninety-seven days’ jail credit. The trial court did not grant the jail credit or explain why the state’s concession of error was incorrect. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand for further proceedings. We affirm all other aspects of the order.

Reversed in part and affirmed in part.

HAZOURI, DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In the order denying Roman’s motion for post-conviction relief, the trial court fully adopted the state’s written response to Roman’s motion. However, in the state’s written response, the state conceded that Roman was entitled to ninety-seven days’ jail credit. The trial court did not grant the jail credit or explain why the state’s concession of error was incorrect. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand for further proceedings. We affirm all other aspects of the order.

Reversed in part and affirmed in part.

HAZOURI, DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 So. 3d 1193, 2012 WL 3192737, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roman-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.