Roman v. Sam's Club/Walmart
Opinion
Anthony Roman appeals the district court’s orders partially dismissing his com[199] plaint and granting summary judgment on the remaining religious discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roman v. Sam’s Club/Walmart, No. 7:10-cv-00524-JCT (W.D.Va. Jan. 7, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
537 F. App'x 198 (Roman v. Sam's Club/Walmart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.