Roman v. Roman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Roman v. Roman

8 A.D.3d 394, 777 N.Y.S.2d 746, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7779

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 7, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 8 A.D.3d 394 (Roman v. Roman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roman v. Roman, 8 A.D.3d 394, 777 N.Y.S.2d 746, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7779 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Edlitz, J.), dated July 11, 2001, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Kava, H.E.), dated May 11, 2001, dismissing his petitions for modification of his child support obligation without prejudice.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[395]*395Contrary to the father’s contention, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in determining that his petitions for modification of his child support obligation were premature.

To the extent that the father requests that this Court vacate or nullify a separate order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated May 4, 2000, we lack jurisdiction to review such order as the father did not appeal from it (see Palumbo v Palumbo, 298 AD2d 373 [2002]).

The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. S. Miller, J.P., Adams, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI