Roman v. Potter

604 F.3d 34
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Roman v. Potter. Read the opinion of the Court — 604 F.3d 34
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided May 12, 2010·No. 09-1600·Errata

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 09-1600

CARMEN J. ROMAN,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

JOHN E. POTTER, United States Postmaster General, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,

Defendant, Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on May 5, 2010, is amended as follows:

On page 2, line 2, the word "retaliation" should not be underlined.

On page 13, line 5, a comma should be inserted between "department" and "as."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roman v. Potter, 604 F.3d 34 (1st Cir. 2010).

604 F.3d 34 (Roman v. Potter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.