Roman v. Jacksonville Coach Co.

90 So. 2d 913
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 5, 1956
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 90 So. 2d 913 (Roman v. Jacksonville Coach Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roman v. Jacksonville Coach Co., 90 So. 2d 913 (Fla. 1956).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the rules of this court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from- be, and the same -is hereby granted, and the judgment is

[914]*914Affirmed.

TERRELL, Acting Chief Justice, O’CONNELL and BUFORD, JJ., and LOPEZ, Associate Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parker v. Miracle Strip Boat & Motors Hdqtrs.
341 So. 2d 197 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 So. 2d 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roman-v-jacksonville-coach-co-fla-1956.