Roman v. Goord

249 A.D.2d 617, 670 N.Y.S.2d 808, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3573

This text of 249 A.D.2d 617 (Roman v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roman v. Goord, 249 A.D.2d 617, 670 N.Y.S.2d 808, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3573 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

The Attorney-General has advised this Court by letter that respondent will not be submitting a brief and requests that this proceeding be dismissed as moot inasmuch as the determination under review has been administratively reversed and expungment has been directed. Because petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is moot and the petition is dismissed (see, Matter of Martin v Henderson, 159 AD2d 867).

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. Henderson
159 A.D.2d 867 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 A.D.2d 617, 670 N.Y.S.2d 808, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roman-v-goord-nyappdiv-1998.