Roman v. City of Stamford

551 A.2d 757, 209 Conn. 821
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 26, 1988·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 16 Conn. App. 213, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“When a city charter provision directs the city’s park commission to provide for the care and control of all trees within the limits of public roads, can a municipality be held liable in negligence where an automobile is struck by a falling tree located within the limits of the roadway?”

Paul J. Pacifico, in support of the petition. James V. Minor, assistant corporation counsel, in opposition. , Decided October 26, 1988

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roman v. City of Stamford, 551 A.2d 757, 209 Conn. 821 (Colo. 1988).

551 A.2d 757 (Roman v. City of Stamford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roman v. City of Stamford
559 A.2d 710 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1989)