Roman v. City of Stamford

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Roman v. City of Stamford

551 A.2d 757, 209 Conn. 821

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedOctober 26, 1988

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 551 A.2d 757 (Roman v. City of Stamford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roman v. City of Stamford, 551 A.2d 757, 209 Conn. 821 (Colo. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 16 Conn. App. 213, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“When a city charter provision directs the city’s park commission to provide for the care and control of all trees within the limits of public roads, can a municipality be held liable in negligence where an automobile is struck by a falling tree located within the limits of the roadway?”

Paul J. Pacifico, in support of the petition. James V. Minor, assistant corporation counsel, in opposition. , Decided October 26, 1988

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 16 Conn. App. 213, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“When a city charter provision directs the city’s park commission to provide for the care and control of all trees within the limits of public roads, can a municipality be held liable in negligence where an automobile is struck by a falling tree located within the limits of the roadway?”

Paul J. Pacifico, in support of the petition. James V. Minor, assistant corporation counsel, in opposition. , Decided October 26, 1988

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

551 A.2d 757, 209 Conn. 821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roman-v-city-of-stamford-conn-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack