Roman v. City of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Roman v. City of Miami

636 So. 2d 882, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4683, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1111

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 17, 1994

DocketNo. 93-1600

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 636 So. 2d 882 (Roman v. City of Miami) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roman v. City of Miami, 636 So. 2d 882, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4683, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1111 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Roman appeals from an order of final summary judgment entered in favor of [883]*883Rolando Martinez. We affirm. See May v. Crounse, 598 So.2d 303 (Fla. 3d DCA) (landowner under no duty to keep abutting sidewalk free of accumulated debris), rev. denied, 606 So.2d 1165 (Fla.1992); Cantens v. Jeff-Son, Inc., 381 So.2d 307 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (hotel has no duty to maintain abutting public sidewalk); see also Mahoney v. Burger King Corp., 600 So.2d 1252 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (summary judgment for property owner appropriate where plaintiff presented no evidence that owner had actual or constructive knowledge of condition that allegedly caused fall).

As to the claims against the City of Miami, we do not have jurisdiction and dismiss the appeal. See Metro-Dade Police Dept. v. Hidalgo, 601 So.2d 1259 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (where appellant fails to file timely notice of appeal from order to be reviewed, this court is without subject matter jurisdiction).

Affirmed as to appellee Martinez; appeal dismissed as to the City of Miami.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

David Roman appeals from an order of final summary judgment entered in favor of [883]*883Rolando Martinez. We affirm. See May v. Crounse, 598 So.2d 303 (Fla. 3d DCA) (landowner under no duty to keep abutting sidewalk free of accumulated debris), rev. denied, 606 So.2d 1165 (Fla.1992); Cantens v. Jeff-Son, Inc., 381 So.2d 307 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (hotel has no duty to maintain abutting public sidewalk); see also Mahoney v. Burger King Corp., 600 So.2d 1252 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (summary judgment for property owner appropriate where plaintiff presented no evidence that owner had actual or constructive knowledge of condition that allegedly caused fall).

As to the claims against the City of Miami, we do not have jurisdiction and dismiss the appeal. See Metro-Dade Police Dept. v. Hidalgo, 601 So.2d 1259 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (where appellant fails to file timely notice of appeal from order to be reviewed, this court is without subject matter jurisdiction).

Affirmed as to appellee Martinez; appeal dismissed as to the City of Miami.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

636 So. 2d 882, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4683, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roman-v-city-of-miami-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack